diff options
| author | Andreas Grois <andi@grois.info> | 2024-07-15 00:12:41 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Andreas Grois <andi@grois.info> | 2024-07-15 00:12:41 +0200 |
| commit | 3cc5a856fb671b61c4765d9fa41681167401ff74 (patch) | |
| tree | ef2795bd2b9f58fa9f535ab1a93cb21c679949ea /Common | |
| parent | 5a2112e72df33cb926d54d08fafed7b8d0514f1b (diff) | |
Continue on CompleteTree.heapReplaceElementAtIsHeap. Nearly done.
Diffstat (limited to 'Common')
| -rw-r--r-- | Common/BinaryHeap.lean | 85 |
1 files changed, 72 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/Common/BinaryHeap.lean b/Common/BinaryHeap.lean index 11a66ee..f4212c5 100644 --- a/Common/BinaryHeap.lean +++ b/Common/BinaryHeap.lean @@ -26,6 +26,11 @@ theorem CompleteTree.root_unfold {α : Type u} {o p : Nat} (v : α) (l : Complet def transitive_le {α : Type u} (le : α → α → Bool) : Prop := ∀(a b c : α), (le a b) ∧ (le b c) → le a c def total_le {α : Type u} (le : α → α → Bool) : Prop := ∀(a b : α), le a b ∨ le b a +def reflexive_le {α : Type u} {le : α → α → Bool} (h₁ : total_le le) (a : α) : le a a := by + unfold total_le at h₁ + have h₁ := h₁ a a + cases h₁ <;> assumption + def not_le_imp_le {α : Type u} {le : α → α → Bool} (h₁ : total_le le) : ∀(a b : α), ¬le a b → le b a := by intros a b h₂ have h₁ := h₁ a b @@ -911,14 +916,19 @@ theorem CompleteTree.heapReplaceRootIsHeap {α : Type u} {n: Nat} (le : α → have h₁₆ : le (l.root _) value := heapReplaceRootIsHeapLeRootAuxLe le h₃ h₄ h₁₄ h₁₃.symm simp[heapReplaceRootIsHeapLeRootAux, *] -private theorem CompleteTree.heapReplaceElementAtIsHeapLeRootAux_RootLeValue {α : Type u} {n : Nat} (le : α → α → Bool) (index : Fin n) (value : α) (heap : CompleteTree α n) (h₁ : HeapPredicate heap le) (h₂ : n > 0) (h₃ : le (root heap h₂) value) : HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf le (root heap h₂) (heapReplaceElementAt le index value heap h₂).snd := by +private theorem CompleteTree.heapReplaceElementAtIsHeapLeRootAux_RootLeValue {α : Type u} {n : Nat} (le : α → α → Bool) (index : Fin n) (value : α) (heap : CompleteTree α n) (h₁ : HeapPredicate heap le) (h₂ : n > 0) (h₃ : le (root heap h₂) value) (h₄ : total_le le) : HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf le (root heap h₂) (heapReplaceElementAt le index value heap h₂).snd := by unfold heapReplaceElementAt split case isTrue => exact heapReplaceRootIsHeapLeRootAux le value heap h₁ h₂ h₃ case isFalse hi => split rename_i o p v l r h₆ h₇ h₈ index h₁ h₅ - sorry + cases h₉ : le v value <;> simp (config := {ground := true}) + case false => rw[root_unfold] at h₃; exact absurd h₃ ((Bool.not_eq_true (le v value)).substr h₉) + case true => + rw[root_unfold] + split + <;> simp![reflexive_le, h₄] private theorem CompleteTree.heapReplaceElementAtIsHeapLeRootAux_ValueLeRoot {α : Type u} {n : Nat} (le : α → α → Bool) (index : Fin n) (value : α) (heap : CompleteTree α n) (h₁ : HeapPredicate heap le) (h₂ : n > 0) (h₃ : le value (root heap h₂)) : HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf le value (heapReplaceElementAt le index value heap h₂).snd := sorry @@ -938,27 +948,76 @@ theorem CompleteTree.heapReplaceElementAtIsHeap {α : Type u} {n : Nat} (le : α <;> simp[h₂] case false.isFalse => have h₁₀ := not_le_imp_le h₄ v value (Bool.eq_false_iff.mp h₁₀) + have h₁₄ : p > 0 := by cases p; exact absurd (Nat.lt_succ.mp index.isLt) h; exact Nat.zero_lt_succ _ apply And.intro <;> try apply And.intro - case left => exact heapReplaceElementAtIsHeap le ⟨index.val - o - 1, _⟩ v r (by omega) h₂.right.left h₃ h₄ + case left => exact heapReplaceElementAtIsHeap le ⟨index.val - o - 1, _⟩ v r h₁₄ h₂.right.left h₃ h₄ case right.left => exact HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf_transitive h₃ h₁₀ h₂.right.right.left case right.right => - have h₁₁: HeapPredicate (heapReplaceElementAt le ⟨index.val - o - 1, (by omega)⟩ v r (by omega)).snd le := + have h₁₁: HeapPredicate (heapReplaceElementAt le ⟨index.val - o - 1, (by omega)⟩ v r h₁₄).snd le := (heapReplaceElementAtIsHeap le ⟨index.val - o - 1, (by omega)⟩ v r _ h₂.right.left h₃ h₄) - cases h₁₂ : le v (r.root (by omega : 0 < p)) + cases h₁₂ : le v (r.root h₁₄) case false => - have h₁₃ := h₂.right.right.right - unfold HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf at h₁₃ cases p - omega - exact absurd h₁₃ ((Bool.eq_false_iff).mp h₁₂) + exact absurd (Nat.lt_succ.mp index.isLt) h + exact absurd h₂.right.right.right ((Bool.eq_false_iff).mp h₁₂) case true => have h₁₃ := heapReplaceElementAtIsHeapLeRootAux_ValueLeRoot le ⟨index.val - o - 1, (by omega)⟩ v r h₂.right.left (by omega) h₁₂ apply HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf_transitive h₃ _ h₁₃ exact h₁₀ - case false.isTrue => sorry - case true.isFalse => sorry - case true.isTrue => sorry - + case false.isTrue => + have h₁₀ := not_le_imp_le h₄ v value (Bool.eq_false_iff.mp h₁₀) + have h₁₄ : o > 0 := by cases o; simp at h₅ h; exact absurd (Fin.val_inj.mp h : index = 0) h₅; exact Nat.zero_lt_succ _ + apply And.intro <;> try apply And.intro + case left => exact heapReplaceElementAtIsHeap le ⟨index.val - 1, _⟩ v l h₁₄ h₂.left h₃ h₄ + case right.right => exact HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf_transitive h₃ h₁₀ h₂.right.right.right + case right.left => + have h₁₁: HeapPredicate (heapReplaceElementAt le ⟨index.val - 1, (_)⟩ v l h₁₄).snd le := + (heapReplaceElementAtIsHeap le ⟨index.val - 1, (by omega)⟩ v l _ h₂.left h₃ h₄) + cases h₁₂ : le v (l.root h₁₄) + case false => + cases o + contradiction -- h₁₄ is False + exact absurd h₂.right.right.left ((Bool.eq_false_iff).mp h₁₂) + case true => + have h₁₃ := heapReplaceElementAtIsHeapLeRootAux_ValueLeRoot le ⟨index.val - 1, (by omega)⟩ v l h₂.left (by omega) h₁₂ + apply HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf_transitive h₃ _ h₁₃ + exact h₁₀ + case true.isFalse => + have h₁₄ : p > 0 := by cases p; exact absurd (Nat.lt_succ.mp index.isLt) h; exact Nat.zero_lt_succ _ + apply And.intro + case left => exact heapReplaceElementAtIsHeap le ⟨index.val - o - 1, _⟩ value r h₁₄ h₂.right.left h₃ h₄ + case right => + have h₁₁: HeapPredicate (heapReplaceElementAt le ⟨index.val - o - 1, (by omega)⟩ v r (h₁₄)).snd le := + (heapReplaceElementAtIsHeap le ⟨index.val - o - 1, (by omega)⟩ v r _ h₂.right.left h₃ h₄) + cases h₁₂ : le value (r.root h₁₄) + case false => + have h₁₃ := heapReplaceElementAtIsHeapLeRootAux_RootLeValue le ⟨index.val - o - 1, (by omega)⟩ value r h₂.right.left (by omega) (not_le_imp_le h₄ value (r.root h₁₄) (Bool.eq_false_iff.mp h₁₂)) h₄ + apply HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf_transitive h₃ _ h₁₃ + cases p + contradiction -- h₁₄ is False + exact h₂.right.right.right + case true => + have h₁₃ := heapReplaceElementAtIsHeapLeRootAux_ValueLeRoot le ⟨index.val - o - 1, (by omega)⟩ value r h₂.right.left (by omega) h₁₂ + apply HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf_transitive h₃ _ h₁₃ + exact h₁₀ + case true.isTrue => + have h₁₄ : o > 0 := by cases o; simp at h₅ h; exact absurd (Fin.val_inj.mp h : index = 0) h₅; exact Nat.zero_lt_succ _ + apply And.intro + case left => exact heapReplaceElementAtIsHeap le ⟨index.val - 1, _⟩ value l h₁₄ h₂.left h₃ h₄ + case right => + have h₁₁: HeapPredicate (heapReplaceElementAt le ⟨index.val - 1, (by omega)⟩ v l h₁₄).snd le := + (heapReplaceElementAtIsHeap le ⟨index.val - 1, (by omega)⟩ v l _ h₂.left h₃ h₄) + cases h₁₂ : le value (l.root h₁₄) + case false => + have h₁₃ := heapReplaceElementAtIsHeapLeRootAux_RootLeValue le ⟨index.val - 1, (by omega)⟩ value l h₂.left (by omega) (not_le_imp_le h₄ value (l.root h₁₄) (Bool.eq_false_iff.mp h₁₂)) h₄ + apply HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf_transitive h₃ _ h₁₃ + cases o + contradiction -- h₁₄ is False + exact h₂.right.right.left + case true => + have h₁₃ := heapReplaceElementAtIsHeapLeRootAux_ValueLeRoot le ⟨index.val - 1, (by omega)⟩ value l h₂.left (by omega) h₁₂ + apply HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf_transitive h₃ _ h₁₃ + exact h₁₀ /--Removes the element at a given index. Use `CompleteTree.indexOf` to find the respective index.-/ def CompleteTree.heapRemoveAt {α : Type u} {n : Nat} (le : α → α → Bool) (index : Fin (n+1)) (heap : CompleteTree α (n+1)) : α × CompleteTree α n := |
