diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Common')
| -rw-r--r-- | Common/BinaryHeap.lean | 1251 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Common/Nat.lean | 172 |
2 files changed, 0 insertions, 1423 deletions
diff --git a/Common/BinaryHeap.lean b/Common/BinaryHeap.lean deleted file mode 100644 index fe47c10..0000000 --- a/Common/BinaryHeap.lean +++ /dev/null @@ -1,1251 +0,0 @@ -import Common.Nat - -namespace BinaryHeap - -inductive CompleteTree (α : Type u) : Nat → Type u - | leaf : CompleteTree α 0 - | branch : - (val : α) - → (left : CompleteTree α n) - → (right : CompleteTree α m) - → m ≤ n - → n < 2*(m+1) - → (n+1).isPowerOfTwo ∨ (m+1).isPowerOfTwo - → CompleteTree α (n+m+1) - -/-- Returns the element stored in the root node. -/ -def CompleteTree.root (tree : CompleteTree α n) (_ : 0 < n) : α := match tree with -| .branch a _ _ _ _ _ => a - -/-- Same as CompleteTree.root, but a bit more ergonomic to use. However, CompleteTree.root is better suited for proofs-/ -def CompleteTree.root' (tree : CompleteTree α (n+1)) : α := tree.root (Nat.zero_lt_succ n) - -/-- Helper to rw away root, because Lean 4.9 makes it unnecessarily hard to deal with match in tactics mode... -/ -theorem CompleteTree.root_unfold {α : Type u} {o p : Nat} (v : α) (l : CompleteTree α o) (r : CompleteTree α p) (h₁ : p ≤ o) (h₂ : o < 2 * (p + 1)) (h₃ : (o + 1).isPowerOfTwo ∨ (p + 1).isPowerOfTwo) (h₄ : o + p + 1 > 0): (CompleteTree.branch v l r h₁ h₂ h₃).root h₄ = v := rfl - -def transitive_le {α : Type u} (le : α → α → Bool) : Prop := ∀(a b c : α), (le a b) ∧ (le b c) → le a c -def total_le {α : Type u} (le : α → α → Bool) : Prop := ∀(a b : α), le a b ∨ le b a - -def reflexive_le {α : Type u} {le : α → α → Bool} (h₁ : total_le le) (a : α) : le a a := by - unfold total_le at h₁ - have h₁ := h₁ a a - cases h₁ <;> assumption - -def not_le_imp_le {α : Type u} {le : α → α → Bool} (h₁ : total_le le) : ∀(a b : α), ¬le a b → le b a := by - intros a b h₂ - have h₁ := h₁ a b - cases h₁ - . contradiction - . trivial - -def HeapPredicate {α : Type u} {n : Nat} (heap : CompleteTree α n) (le : α → α → Bool) : Prop := - match heap with - | .leaf => True - | .branch a left right _ _ _ => - HeapPredicate left le ∧ HeapPredicate right le ∧ leOrLeaf a left ∧ leOrLeaf a right - where leOrLeaf := λ {m : Nat} (v : α) (h : CompleteTree α m) ↦ match m with - | .zero => true - | .succ o => le v (h.root (Nat.succ_pos o)) - -/--Please do not use this for anything meaningful. It's a debug function, with horrible performance.-/ -instance {α : Type u} [ToString α] : ToString (CompleteTree α n) where - toString := λt ↦ - --not very fast, doesn't matter, is for debugging - let rec max_width := λ {m : Nat} (t : (CompleteTree α m)) ↦ match m, t with - | 0, .leaf => 0 - | (_+_+1), CompleteTree.branch a left right _ _ _ => max (ToString.toString a).length $ max (max_width left) (max_width right) - let max_width := max_width t - let lines_left := Nat.log2 (n+1).nextPowerOfTwo - let rec print_line := λ (mw : Nat) {m : Nat} (t : (CompleteTree α m)) (lines : Nat) ↦ - match m, t with - | 0, _ => "" - | (_+_+1), CompleteTree.branch a left right _ _ _ => - let thisElem := ToString.toString a - let thisElem := (List.replicate (mw - thisElem.length) ' ').asString ++ thisElem - let elems_in_last_line := if lines == 0 then 0 else 2^(lines-1) - let total_chars_this_line := elems_in_last_line * mw + 2*(elems_in_last_line)+1 - let left_offset := (total_chars_this_line - mw) / 2 - let whitespaces := max left_offset 1 - let whitespaces := List.replicate whitespaces ' ' - let thisline := whitespaces.asString ++ thisElem ++ whitespaces.asString ++"\n" - let leftLines := (print_line mw left (lines-1) ).splitOn "\n" - let rightLines := (print_line mw right (lines-1) ).splitOn "\n" ++ [""] - let combined := leftLines.zip (rightLines) - let combined := combined.map λ (a : String × String) ↦ a.fst ++ a.snd - thisline ++ combined.foldl (· ++ "\n" ++ ·) "" - print_line max_width t lines_left - -/-- Extracts the element count. For when pattern matching is too much work. -/ -def CompleteTree.length : CompleteTree α n → Nat := λ_ ↦ n - -/-- Returns the lenght of the left sub-tree. Mostly exists as a helper for expressing the return type of CompleteTree.left -/ -def CompleteTree.leftLen (tree : CompleteTree α n) (_ : n > 0) : Nat := match n, tree with -| (_+_), .branch _ l _ _ _ _ => l.length - -def CompleteTree.leftLen' (tree : CompleteTree α (n+1)) : Nat := tree.leftLen (Nat.zero_lt_succ n) - -/-- Returns the lenght of the right sub-tree. Mostly exists as a helper for expressing the return type of CompleteTree.right -/ -def CompleteTree.rightLen (tree : CompleteTree α n) (_ : n > 0) : Nat := match n, tree with -| (_+_), .branch _ _ r _ _ _ => r.length - -def CompleteTree.rightLen' (tree : CompleteTree α (n+1)) : Nat := tree.rightLen (Nat.zero_lt_succ n) - -def CompleteTree.left (tree : CompleteTree α n) (h₁ : n > 0) : CompleteTree α (tree.leftLen h₁) := match n, tree with -| (_+_), .branch _ l _ _ _ _ => l - -def CompleteTree.left' (tree : CompleteTree α (n+1)) : CompleteTree α (tree.leftLen (Nat.zero_lt_succ n)) := tree.left (Nat.zero_lt_succ n) - -/-- Helper to rw away left, because Lean 4.9 makes it unnecessarily hard to deal with match in tactics mode... -/ -theorem CompleteTree.left_unfold {α : Type u} {o p : Nat} (v : α) (l : CompleteTree α o) (r : CompleteTree α p) (h₁ : p ≤ o) (h₂ : o < 2 * (p + 1)) (h₃ : (o + 1).isPowerOfTwo ∨ (p + 1).isPowerOfTwo) (h₄ : o + p + 1 > 0): (CompleteTree.branch v l r h₁ h₂ h₃).left h₄ = l := rfl - -def CompleteTree.right (tree : CompleteTree α n) (h₁ : n > 0) : CompleteTree α (tree.rightLen h₁) := match n, tree with -| (_+_), .branch _ _ r _ _ _ => r - -def CompleteTree.right' (tree : CompleteTree α (n+1)) : CompleteTree α (tree.rightLen (Nat.zero_lt_succ n)) := tree.right (Nat.zero_lt_succ n) - -/-- Helper to rw away right, because Lean 4.9 makes it unnecessarily hard to deal with match in tactics mode... -/ -theorem CompleteTree.right_unfold {α : Type u} {o p : Nat} (v : α) (l : CompleteTree α o) (r : CompleteTree α p) (h₁ : p ≤ o) (h₂ : o < 2 * (p + 1)) (h₃ : (o + 1).isPowerOfTwo ∨ (p + 1).isPowerOfTwo) (h₄ : o + p + 1 > 0): (CompleteTree.branch v l r h₁ h₂ h₃).right h₄ = r := rfl - -/--Creates an empty CompleteTree. Needs the heap predicate as parameter.-/ -abbrev CompleteTree.empty {α : Type u} := CompleteTree.leaf (α := α) - -theorem CompleteTree.emptyIsHeap {α : Type u} (le : α → α → Bool) : HeapPredicate CompleteTree.empty le := by trivial - -private theorem power_of_two_mul_two_lt {n m : Nat} (h₁ : m.isPowerOfTwo) (h₂ : n < 2*m) (h₃ : ¬(n+1).isPowerOfTwo) : n+1 < 2*m := - if h₄ : n+1 > 2*m then by - have h₂ := Nat.succ_le_of_lt h₂ - rewrite[←Nat.not_ge_eq] at h₂ - simp_arith at h₄ - contradiction - else if h₅ : n+1 = 2*m then by - have h₆ := Nat.mul2_isPowerOfTwo_of_isPowerOfTwo h₁ - rewrite[Nat.mul_comm 2 m] at h₅ - rewrite[←h₅] at h₆ - contradiction - else by - simp_arith at h₄ - exact Nat.lt_of_le_of_ne h₄ h₅ - -private theorem power_of_two_mul_two_le {n m : Nat} (h₁ : (n+1).isPowerOfTwo) (h₂ : n < 2*(m+1)) (h₃ : ¬(m+1).isPowerOfTwo) (h₄ : m > 0): n < 2*m := - if h₅ : n > 2*m then by - simp_arith at h₂ - simp_arith at h₅ - have h₆ : n+1 = 2*(m+1) := by simp_arith[Nat.le_antisymm h₂ h₅] - rewrite[h₆] at h₁ - rewrite[←(Nat.mul2_ispowerOfTwo_iff_isPowerOfTwo (m+1))] at h₁ - contradiction - else if h₆ : n = 2*m then by - -- since (n+1) is a power of 2, n cannot be an even number, but n = 2*m means it's even - -- ha, thought I wouldn't see that, didn't you? Thought you're smarter than I, computer? - have h₇ : n > 0 := by rewrite[h₆] - apply Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h₄ (by decide :2 > 0) - have h₈ : n ≠ 0 := Ne.symm $ Nat.ne_of_lt h₇ - have h₉ := Nat.isPowerOfTwo_even_or_one h₁ - simp[h₈] at h₉ - have h₉ := Nat.pred_even_odd h₉ (by simp_arith[h₇]) - simp at h₉ - have h₁₀ := Nat.mul_2_is_even h₆ - have h₁₀ := Nat.even_not_odd_even.mp h₁₀ - contradiction - else by - simp[Nat.not_gt_eq] at h₅ - have h₅ := Nat.eq_or_lt_of_le h₅ - simp[h₆] at h₅ - assumption - -/--Adds a new element to a given CompleteTree.-/ -def CompleteTree.heapPush (le : α → α → Bool) (elem : α) (heap : CompleteTree α o) : CompleteTree α (o+1) := - match o, heap with - | 0, .leaf => CompleteTree.branch elem (CompleteTree.leaf) (CompleteTree.leaf) (by simp) (by simp) (by simp[Nat.one_isPowerOfTwo]) - | (n+m+1), .branch a left right p max_height_difference subtree_complete => - let (elem, a) := if le elem a then (a, elem) else (elem, a) - -- okay, based on n and m we know if we want to add left or right. - -- the left tree is full, if (n+1) is a power of two AND n != m - let leftIsFull := (n+1).nextPowerOfTwo = n+1 - if r : m < n ∧ leftIsFull then - have s : (m + 1 < n + 1) = (m < n) := by simp_arith - have q : m + 1 ≤ n := by apply Nat.le_of_lt_succ - rewrite[Nat.succ_eq_add_one] - rewrite[s] - simp[r] - have difference_decreased := Nat.le_succ_of_le $ Nat.le_succ_of_le max_height_difference - let result := branch a left (right.heapPush le elem) (q) difference_decreased (by simp[(Nat.power_of_two_iff_next_power_eq (n+1)), r]) - result - else - have q : m ≤ n+1 := by apply (Nat.le_of_succ_le) - simp_arith[p] - have right_is_power_of_two : (m+1).isPowerOfTwo := - if s : n = m then by - rewrite[s] at subtree_complete - simp at subtree_complete - exact subtree_complete - else if h₁ : leftIsFull then by - rewrite[Decidable.not_and_iff_or_not (m<n) leftIsFull] at r - cases r - case inl h₂ => rewrite[Nat.not_lt_eq] at h₂ - have h₃ := Nat.not_le_of_gt $ Nat.lt_of_le_of_ne h₂ s - contradiction - case inr h₂ => simp at h₂ - contradiction - else by - simp[leftIsFull] at h₁ - rewrite[←Nat.power_of_two_iff_next_power_eq] at h₁ - cases subtree_complete - case inl => contradiction - case inr => trivial - have still_in_range : n + 1 < 2 * (m + 1) := by - rewrite[Decidable.not_and_iff_or_not (m<n) leftIsFull] at r - cases r - case inl h₁ => rewrite[Nat.not_gt_eq n m] at h₁ - simp_arith[Nat.le_antisymm h₁ p] - case inr h₁ => simp[←Nat.power_of_two_iff_next_power_eq, leftIsFull] at h₁ - simp[h₁] at subtree_complete - exact power_of_two_mul_two_lt subtree_complete max_height_difference h₁ - let result := branch a (left.heapPush le elem) right q still_in_range (Or.inr right_is_power_of_two) - have letMeSpellItOutForYou : n + 1 + m + 1 = n + m + 1 + 1 := by simp_arith - letMeSpellItOutForYou ▸ result - -private theorem CompleteTree.rootSeesThroughCast - (n m : Nat) - (h₁ : n + 1 + m = n + m + 1) - (h₂ : 0 < n + 1 + m) - (h₃ : 0 < n + m + 1) - (heap : CompleteTree α (n+1+m)) : (h₁▸heap).root h₃ = heap.root h₂ := by - induction m generalizing n - case zero => simp - case succ o ho => - have h₄ := ho (n+1) - have h₅ : n + 1 + 1 + o = n + 1 + (Nat.succ o) := by simp_arith - have h₆ : n + 1 + o + 1 = n + (Nat.succ o + 1) := by simp_arith - rewrite[h₅, h₆] at h₄ - revert heap h₁ h₂ h₃ - assumption - ---- Same as rootSeesThroughCast, but in the other direction. -private theorem CompleteTree.rootSeesThroughCast2 - (n m : Nat) - (h₁ : n + m + 1 = n + 1 + m) - (h₂ : 0 < n + m + 1) - (h₃ : 0 < n + 1 + m) - (heap : CompleteTree α (n+m+1)) : (h₁▸heap).root h₃ = heap.root h₂ := by - induction m generalizing n - case zero => simp - case succ mm mh => - have h₄ := mh (n+1) - have h₅ : n + 1 + mm + 1 = n + Nat.succ mm + 1 := by simp_arith - have h₆ : n + 1 + 1 + mm = n + 1 + Nat.succ mm := by simp_arith - rw[h₅, h₆] at h₄ - revert heap h₁ h₂ h₃ - assumption - -theorem CompleteTree.heapPushRootSameOrElem (elem : α) (heap : CompleteTree α o) (lt : α → α → Bool) (h₂ : 0 < o): (CompleteTree.root (heap.heapPush lt elem) (Nat.succ_pos o) = elem) ∨ (CompleteTree.root (heap.heapPush lt elem) (Nat.succ_pos o) = CompleteTree.root heap h₂) := by - unfold heapPush - split --match o, heap - contradiction - simp - rename_i n m v l r _ _ _ - split -- if h : m < n ∧ Nat.nextPowerOfTwo (n + 1) = n + 1 then - case h_2.isTrue h => - cases (lt elem v) <;> simp[instDecidableEqBool, Bool.decEq, CompleteTree.root] - case h_2.isFalse h => - rw[rootSeesThroughCast n (m+1) (by simp_arith) (by simp_arith) (by simp_arith)] - cases (lt elem v) - <;> simp[instDecidableEqBool, Bool.decEq, CompleteTree.root] - -theorem CompleteTree.heapPushEmptyElem (elem : α) (heap : CompleteTree α o) (lt : α → α → Bool) (h₂ : ¬0 < o) : (CompleteTree.root (heap.heapPush lt elem) (Nat.succ_pos o) = elem) := - have : o = 0 := Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero $ (Nat.not_lt_eq 0 o).mp h₂ - match o, heap with - | 0, .leaf => by simp[CompleteTree.heapPush, root] - - -theorem HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf_transitive (h₁ : transitive_le le) : le a b → HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf le b h → HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf le a h := by - unfold leOrLeaf - intros h₂ h₃ - rename_i n - cases n <;> simp - apply h₁ a b _ - exact ⟨h₂, h₃⟩ - -private theorem HeapPredicate.seesThroughCast - (n m : Nat) - (lt : α → α → Bool) - (h₁ : n+1+m+1=n+m+1+1) - (h₂ : 0<n+1+m+1) - (h₃ : 0<n+m+1+1) - (heap : CompleteTree α (n+1+m+1)) : HeapPredicate heap lt → HeapPredicate (h₁▸heap) lt := by - unfold HeapPredicate - intro h₄ - induction m generalizing n - case zero => simp[h₄] - case succ o ho => - have h₅ := ho (n+1) - have h₆ : n+1+1+o+1 = n+1+(Nat.succ o)+1 := by simp_arith - rw[h₆] at h₅ - have h₆ : n + 1 + o + 1 + 1 = n + (Nat.succ o + 1 + 1) := by simp_arith - rewrite[h₆] at h₅ - revert heap h₁ h₂ h₃ - assumption - -mutual -/-- - Helper for CompleteTree.heapPushIsHeap, to make one function out of both branches. - Sorry for the ugly signature, but this was the easiest thing to extract. - -/ -private theorem CompleteTree.heapPushIsHeapAux {α : Type u} (le : α → α → Bool) (n m : Nat) (v elem : α) (l : CompleteTree α n) (r : CompleteTree α m) (h₁ : HeapPredicate l le ∧ HeapPredicate r le ∧ HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf le v l ∧ HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf le v r) (h₂ : transitive_le le) (h₃ : total_le le): HeapPredicate l le ∧ - let smaller := (if le elem v then elem else v) - let larger := (if le elem v then v else elem) - HeapPredicate (heapPush le larger r) le - ∧ HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf le smaller l - ∧ HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf le smaller (heapPush le larger r) - := by - cases h₆ : (le elem v) <;> simp only [Bool.false_eq_true, reduceIte] - case true => - have h₇ : (HeapPredicate (CompleteTree.heapPush le v r) le) := CompleteTree.heapPushIsHeap h₁.right.left h₂ h₃ - simp only [true_and, h₁, h₇, HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf_transitive h₂ h₆ h₁.right.right.left] - cases m - case zero => - have h₈ := heapPushEmptyElem v r le (Nat.not_lt_zero 0) - simp only [HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.reduceAdd, h₈] - assumption - case succ _ => - simp only [HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf] - cases heapPushRootSameOrElem v r le (Nat.succ_pos _) - <;> rename_i h₇ - <;> rw[h₇] - . assumption - apply h₂ elem v - exact ⟨h₆, h₁.right.right.right⟩ - case false => - have h₇ : (HeapPredicate (CompleteTree.heapPush le elem r) le) := CompleteTree.heapPushIsHeap h₁.right.left h₂ h₃ - simp only [true_and, h₁, h₇] - have h₈ : le v elem := not_le_imp_le h₃ elem v (by simp only [h₆, Bool.false_eq_true, not_false_eq_true]) - cases m - case zero => - have h₇ := heapPushEmptyElem elem r le (Nat.not_lt_zero 0) - simp only [HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, Nat.reduceAdd, h₇] - assumption - case succ _ => - cases heapPushRootSameOrElem elem r le (Nat.succ_pos _) - <;> rename_i h₉ - <;> simp only [HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, h₈, h₉] - exact h₁.right.right.right - -theorem CompleteTree.heapPushIsHeap {α : Type u} {elem : α} {heap : CompleteTree α o} {le : α → α → Bool} (h₁ : HeapPredicate heap le) (h₂ : transitive_le le) (h₃ : total_le le) : HeapPredicate (heap.heapPush le elem) le := by - unfold heapPush - split -- match o, heap with - trivial - case h_2 n m v l r m_le_n _ _ => - simp - split -- if h₅ : m < n ∧ Nat.nextPowerOfTwo (n + 1) = n + 1 then - case' isTrue => - have h := heapPushIsHeapAux le n m v elem l r h₁ h₂ h₃ - case' isFalse => - apply HeapPredicate.seesThroughCast <;> try simp_arith[h₂] --gets rid of annoying cast. - have h := heapPushIsHeapAux le m n v elem r l (And.intro h₁.right.left $ And.intro h₁.left $ And.intro h₁.right.right.right h₁.right.right.left) h₂ h₃ - all_goals - unfold HeapPredicate - cases h₆ : (le elem v) - <;> simp only [h₆, Bool.false_eq_true, reduceIte] at h - <;> simp only [instDecidableEqBool, Bool.decEq, h, and_self] -end - -/--Helper function for CompleteTree.indexOf.-/ -def CompleteTree.indexOfAux {α : Type u} (heap : CompleteTree α o) (pred : α → Bool) (currentIndex : Nat) : Option (Fin (o+currentIndex)) := - match o, heap with - | 0, .leaf => none - | (n+m+1), .branch a left right _ _ _ => - have sum_n_m_succ_curr : n + m.succ + currentIndex > 0 := Nat.add_pos_left (Nat.add_pos_right n (Nat.succ_pos m)) currentIndex - if pred a then - let result := Fin.ofNat' currentIndex sum_n_m_succ_curr - some result - else - let found_left := left.indexOfAux pred (currentIndex + 1) - let found_left : Option (Fin (n+m+1+currentIndex)) := found_left.map λ a ↦ Fin.ofNat' a sum_n_m_succ_curr - let found_right := - found_left - <|> - (right.indexOfAux pred (currentIndex + n + 1)).map ((λ a ↦ Fin.ofNat' a sum_n_m_succ_curr) : _ → Fin (n+m+1+currentIndex)) - found_right - -/--Finds the first occurance of a given element in the heap and returns its index. Indices are depth first.-/ -def CompleteTree.indexOf {α : Type u} (heap : CompleteTree α o) (pred : α → Bool) : Option (Fin o) := - indexOfAux heap pred 0 - -/--Returns the lement at the given index. Indices are depth first.-/ -def CompleteTree.get {α : Type u} {n : Nat} (index : Fin (n+1)) (heap : CompleteTree α (n+1)) : α := - match h₁ : index, h₂ : n, heap with - | 0, (_+_), .branch v _ _ _ _ _ => v - | ⟨j+1,h₃⟩, (o+p), .branch _ l r _ _ _ => - if h₄ : j < o then - match o with - | (oo+1) => get ⟨j, h₄⟩ l - else - have h₅ : n - o = p := Nat.sub_eq_of_eq_add $ (Nat.add_comm o p).subst h₂ - have : p ≠ 0 := - have h₆ : o < n := Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.ge_of_not_lt h₄) (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h₃) - h₅.symm.substr $ Nat.sub_ne_zero_of_lt h₆ - have h₆ : j - o < p := h₅.subst $ Nat.sub_lt_sub_right (Nat.ge_of_not_lt h₄) $ Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h₃ - have _termination : j - o < index.val := (Fin.val_inj.mpr h₁).substr (Nat.sub_lt_succ j o) - match p with - | (pp + 1) => get ⟨j - o, h₆⟩ r - -/-- Helper for heapRemoveLastAux -/ -private theorem CompleteTree.removeRightRightNotEmpty {n m : Nat} (m_gt_0_or_rightIsFull : m > 0 ∨ ((m+1).nextPowerOfTwo = m+1 : Bool)) (h₁ : 0 ≠ n + m) (h₂ : ¬(m < n ∧ ((m+1).nextPowerOfTwo = m+1 : Bool))) : m > 0 := - match m_gt_0_or_rightIsFull with - | Or.inl h => h - | Or.inr h => by - simp only [h, and_true, Nat.not_lt] at h₂ - cases n - case zero => exact Nat.zero_lt_of_ne_zero $ (Nat.zero_add m).subst (motive := (·≠0)) h₁.symm - case succ q => - cases m - . exact absurd h₂ $ Nat.not_succ_le_zero q - . exact Nat.succ_pos _ - -/-- Helper for heapRemoveLastAux -/ -private theorem CompleteTree.removeRightLeftIsFull {n m : Nat} (r : ¬(m < n ∧ ((m+1).nextPowerOfTwo = m+1 : Bool))) (m_le_n : m ≤ n) (subtree_complete : (n + 1).isPowerOfTwo ∨ (m + 1).isPowerOfTwo) : (n+1).isPowerOfTwo := by - rewrite[Decidable.not_and_iff_or_not] at r - cases r - case inl h₁ => rewrite[Nat.not_lt_eq] at h₁ - have h₂ := Nat.le_antisymm h₁ m_le_n - rewrite[←h₂] at subtree_complete - simp at subtree_complete - assumption - case inr h₁ => simp(config := {zetaDelta := true })[←Nat.power_of_two_iff_next_power_eq] at h₁ - simp[h₁] at subtree_complete - assumption - -/-- Helper for heapRemoveLastAux -/ -private theorem CompleteTree.stillInRange {n m : Nat} (r : ¬(m < n ∧ ((m+1).nextPowerOfTwo = m+1 : Bool))) (m_le_n : m ≤ n) (m_gt_0 : m > 0) (leftIsFull : (n+1).isPowerOfTwo) (max_height_difference: n < 2 * (m + 1)) : n < 2*m := by - rewrite[Decidable.not_and_iff_or_not] at r - cases r with - | inl h₁ => have m_eq_n : m = n := Nat.le_antisymm m_le_n (Nat.not_lt.mp h₁) - have m_lt_2_m : m < 2 * m := (Nat.one_mul m).subst (motive := λ x ↦ x < 2 * m) $ Nat.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right Nat.one_lt_two m_gt_0 - exact m_eq_n.subst (motive := λx ↦ x < 2 * m) m_lt_2_m - | inr h₁ => simp (config := { zetaDelta := true }) only [← Nat.power_of_two_iff_next_power_eq, decide_eq_true_eq] at h₁ - apply power_of_two_mul_two_le <;> assumption - -private def CompleteTree.heapRemoveLastAux -{α : Type u} -{β : Nat → Type u} -{o : Nat} -(heap : CompleteTree α (o+1)) -(aux0 : α → (β 1)) -(auxl : {prev_size curr_size : Nat} → β prev_size → (h₁ : prev_size < curr_size) → β curr_size) -(auxr : {prev_size curr_size : Nat} → β prev_size → (left_size : Nat) → (h₁ : prev_size + left_size < curr_size) → β curr_size) -: (CompleteTree α o × (β (o+1))) -:= - match o, heap with - | (n+m), .branch a (left : CompleteTree α n) (right : CompleteTree α m) m_le_n max_height_difference subtree_complete => - if p : 0 = (n+m) then - (p▸CompleteTree.leaf, p▸aux0 a) - else - let rightIsFull : Bool := (m+1).nextPowerOfTwo = m+1 - have m_gt_0_or_rightIsFull : m > 0 ∨ rightIsFull := by cases m <;> simp (config := { ground:=true })[rightIsFull] - if r : m < n ∧ rightIsFull then - --remove left - match n, left with - | (l+1), left => - let ((newLeft : CompleteTree α l), res) := left.heapRemoveLastAux aux0 auxl auxr - have q : l + m + 1 = l + 1 + m := Nat.add_right_comm l m 1 - have s : m ≤ l := Nat.le_of_lt_succ r.left - have rightIsFull : (m+1).isPowerOfTwo := (Nat.power_of_two_iff_next_power_eq (m+1)).mpr $ decide_eq_true_eq.mp r.right - have l_lt_2_m_succ : l < 2 * (m+1) := Nat.lt_of_succ_lt max_height_difference - let res := auxl res (by simp_arith) - (q▸CompleteTree.branch a newLeft right s l_lt_2_m_succ (Or.inr rightIsFull), res) - else - --remove right - have m_gt_0 : m > 0 := removeRightRightNotEmpty m_gt_0_or_rightIsFull p r - let l := m.pred - have h₂ : l.succ = m := (Nat.succ_pred $ Nat.not_eq_zero_of_lt (Nat.gt_of_not_le $ Nat.not_le_of_gt m_gt_0)) - let ((newRight : CompleteTree α l), res) := (h₂.symm▸right).heapRemoveLastAux aux0 auxl auxr - have leftIsFull : (n+1).isPowerOfTwo := removeRightLeftIsFull r m_le_n subtree_complete - have still_in_range : n < 2 * (l+1) := h₂.substr (p := λx ↦ n < 2 * x) $ stillInRange r m_le_n m_gt_0 leftIsFull max_height_difference - let res := auxr res n (by omega) - (h₂▸CompleteTree.branch a left newRight (Nat.le_of_succ_le (h₂▸m_le_n)) still_in_range (Or.inl leftIsFull), res) - -private def CompleteTree.heapRemoveLast {α : Type u} {o : Nat} (heap : CompleteTree α (o+1)) : (CompleteTree α o × α) := - heap.heapRemoveLastAux id (λ(a : α) _ ↦ a) (λa _ _ ↦ a) - -private def CompleteTree.heapRemoveLastWithIndex {α : Type u} {o : Nat} (heap : CompleteTree α (o+1)) : (CompleteTree α o × α × Fin (o+1)) := - heap.heapRemoveLastAux (β := λn ↦ α × Fin n) - (λ(a : α) ↦ (a, Fin.mk 0 (Nat.succ_pos 0))) - (λ(a, prev_idx) h₁ ↦ (a, prev_idx.succ.castLE $ Nat.succ_le_of_lt h₁) ) - (λ(a, prev_idx) left_size h₁ ↦ (a, (prev_idx.addNat left_size).succ.castLE $ Nat.succ_le_of_lt h₁)) - -private theorem CompleteTree.heqSameLeftLen {α : Type u} {n m : Nat} {a : CompleteTree α n} {b : CompleteTree α m} (h₁ : n = m) (h₂ : n > 0) (h₃ : HEq a b) : a.leftLen h₂ = b.leftLen (h₁.subst h₂) := by - subst n - have h₃ : a = b := eq_of_heq h₃ - subst a - rfl - -private theorem CompleteTree.heqSameRightLen {α : Type u} {n m : Nat} {a : CompleteTree α n} {b : CompleteTree α m} (h₁ : n = m) (h₂ : n > 0) (h₃ : HEq a b) : a.rightLen h₂ = b.rightLen (h₁.subst h₂) := by - subst n - have h₃ : a = b := eq_of_heq h₃ - subst a - rfl - -/--Shows that the index and value returned by heapRemoveLastWithIndex are consistent.-/ -private theorem CompleteTree.heapRemoveLastWithIndexReturnsItemAtIndex {α : Type u} {o : Nat} (heap : CompleteTree α (o+1)) : heap.get heap.heapRemoveLastWithIndex.snd.snd = heap.heapRemoveLastWithIndex.snd.fst := by - unfold heapRemoveLastWithIndex heapRemoveLastAux - split - rename_i n m v l r m_le_n max_height_difference subtree_full - simp only [Nat.add_eq, Fin.zero_eta, Fin.isValue, decide_eq_true_eq, Fin.castLE_succ] - split - case isTrue n_m_zero => - unfold get - split - case h_1 nn mm vv ll rr mm_le_nn _ _ _ _ he₁ he₂ => - have h₁ : n = 0 := And.left $ Nat.add_eq_zero.mp n_m_zero.symm - have h₂ : m = 0 := And.right $ Nat.add_eq_zero.mp n_m_zero.symm - have h₃ : nn = 0 := And.left (Nat.add_eq_zero.mp $ Eq.symm $ (Nat.zero_add 0).subst (motive := λx ↦ x = nn + mm) $ h₂.subst (motive := λx ↦ 0 + x = nn + mm) (h₁.subst (motive := λx ↦ x + m = nn + mm) he₁)) - have h₄ : mm = 0 := And.right (Nat.add_eq_zero.mp $ Eq.symm $ (Nat.zero_add 0).subst (motive := λx ↦ x = nn + mm) $ h₂.subst (motive := λx ↦ 0 + x = nn + mm) (h₁.subst (motive := λx ↦ x + m = nn + mm) he₁)) - subst n m nn mm - exact And.left $ CompleteTree.branch.inj (eq_of_heq he₂.symm) - case h_2 => - omega -- to annoying to deal with Fin.ofNat... There's a hypothesis that says 0 = ⟨1,_⟩. - case isFalse n_m_not_zero => - unfold get - split - case h_1 nn mm vv ll rr mm_le_nn max_height_difference_2 subtree_full2 _ he₁ he₂ he₃ => - --aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa - --okay, I know that he₁ is False. - --but reducing this wall of text to something the computer understands - I am frightened. - exfalso - revert he₁ - split - case' isTrue => cases l; case leaf hx => exact absurd hx.left $ Nat.not_lt_zero m - all_goals - apply Fin.ne_of_val_ne - simp only [Fin.isValue, Fin.val_succ, Fin.coe_castLE, Fin.coe_addNat, Nat.add_one_ne_zero, not_false_eq_true] - --okay, this wasn't that bad - case h_2 j j_lt_n_add_m nn mm vv ll rr mm_le_nn max_height_difference_2 subtree_full2 heap he₁ he₂ he₃ => - --he₁ relates j to the other indices. This is the important thing here. - --it should be reducible to j = (l or r).heap.heapRemoveLastWithIndex.snd.snd - --or something like it. - - --but first, let's get rid of mm and nn, and vv while at it. - -- which are equal to m, n, v, but we need to deduce this from he₃... - have : n = nn := heqSameLeftLen (congrArg (·+1) he₂) (by simp_arith) he₃ - have : m = mm := heqSameRightLen (congrArg (·+1) he₂) (by simp_arith) he₃ - subst nn mm - simp only [heq_eq_eq, branch.injEq] at he₃ - -- yeah, no more HEq fuglyness! - have : v = vv := he₃.left - have : l = ll := he₃.right.left - have : r = rr := he₃.right.right - subst vv ll rr - split at he₁ - <;> rename_i goLeft - <;> simp only [goLeft, and_self, ↓reduceDite, Fin.isValue] - case' isTrue => - cases l; - case leaf => exact absurd goLeft.left $ Nat.not_lt_zero m - rename_i o p _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - case' isFalse => - cases r; - case leaf => simp (config := { ground := true }) only [and_true, Nat.not_lt, Nat.le_zero_eq] at goLeft; - exact absurd ((Nat.add_zero n).substr goLeft.symm) n_m_not_zero - all_goals - have he₁ := Fin.val_eq_of_eq he₁ - simp only [Fin.isValue, Fin.val_succ, Fin.coe_castLE, Fin.coe_addNat, Nat.reduceEqDiff] at he₁ - have : max_height_difference_2 = max_height_difference := rfl - have : subtree_full2 = subtree_full := rfl - subst max_height_difference_2 subtree_full2 - rename_i del1 del2 - clear del1 del2 - case' isTrue => - have : j < o + p + 1 := by omega --from he₁. It has j = (blah : Fin (o+p+1)).val - case' isFalse => - have : ¬j<n := by omega --from he₁. It has j = something + n. - all_goals - simp only [this, ↓reduceDite, Nat.pred_succ, Fin.isValue] - subst j -- overkill, but unlike rw it works - simp only [Nat.pred_succ, Fin.isValue, Nat.add_sub_cancel, Fin.eta] - apply heapRemoveLastWithIndexReturnsItemAtIndex - done - -private theorem CompleteTree.castZeroHeap (n m : Nat) (heap : CompleteTree α 0) (h₁ : 0=n+m) {le : α → α → Bool} : HeapPredicate (h₁ ▸ heap) le := by - have h₂ : heap = (CompleteTree.empty : CompleteTree α 0) := by - simp[empty] - match heap with - | .leaf => trivial - have h₂ : HeapPredicate heap le := by simp[h₂, empty, emptyIsHeap] - cases m - case succ => contradiction - case zero => - cases n - case succ => contradiction - case zero => - simp[h₁, h₂] - -private theorem HeapPredicate.seesThroughCast2 - (n m : Nat) - (lt : α → α → Bool) - (h₁ : n+m+1=n+1+m) - (h₂ : 0<n+1+m) - (h₃ : 0<n+m+1) - (heap : CompleteTree α (n+m+1)) : HeapPredicate heap lt → HeapPredicate (h₁▸heap) lt := by - unfold HeapPredicate - intro h₄ - induction m generalizing n - case zero => simp[h₄] - case succ o ho => - have h₅ := ho (n+1) - have h₆ : n+1+o+1 = n+(Nat.succ o)+1 := by simp_arith - rw[h₆] at h₅ - have h₆ : n + 1 + 1 + o = n + 1 + Nat.succ o := by simp_arith - rewrite[h₆] at h₅ - revert heap h₁ h₂ h₃ - assumption - --- If there is only one element left, the result is a leaf. -private theorem CompleteTree.heapRemoveLastAuxLeaf -{α : Type u} -{β : Nat → Type u} -(heap : CompleteTree α 1) -(aux0 : α → (β 1)) -(auxl : {prev_size curr_size : Nat} → β prev_size → (h₁ : prev_size < curr_size) → β curr_size) -(auxr : {prev_size curr_size : Nat} → β prev_size → (left_size : Nat) → (h₁ : prev_size + left_size < curr_size) → β curr_size) -: (heap.heapRemoveLastAux aux0 auxl auxr).fst = CompleteTree.leaf := by - let l := (heap.heapRemoveLastAux aux0 auxl auxr).fst - have h₁ : l = CompleteTree.leaf := match l with - | .leaf => rfl - exact h₁ - -private theorem CompleteTree.heapRemoveLastAuxLeavesRoot -{α : Type u} -{β : Nat → Type u} -(heap : CompleteTree α (n+1)) -(aux0 : α → (β 1)) -(auxl : {prev_size curr_size : Nat} → β prev_size → (h₁ : prev_size < curr_size) → β curr_size) -(auxr : {prev_size curr_size : Nat} → β prev_size → (left_size : Nat) → (h₁ : prev_size + left_size < curr_size) → β curr_size) -(h₁ : n > 0) -: heap.root (Nat.zero_lt_of_ne_zero $ Nat.succ_ne_zero n) = (heap.heapRemoveLastAux aux0 auxl auxr).fst.root (h₁) := by - unfold heapRemoveLastAux - split - rename_i o p v l r _ _ _ - have h₃ : (0 ≠ o + p) := Ne.symm $ Nat.not_eq_zero_of_lt h₁ - simp[h₃] - exact - if h₄ : p < o ∧ Nat.nextPowerOfTwo (p + 1) = p + 1 then by - simp[h₄] - cases o - case zero => exact absurd h₄.left $ Nat.not_lt_zero p - case succ oo _ _ _ => - simp -- redundant, but makes goal easier to read - rw[rootSeesThroughCast2 oo p _ (by simp_arith) _] - apply root_unfold - else by - simp[h₄] - cases p - case zero => - simp_arith at h₁ -- basically o ≠ 0 - simp_arith (config := {ground := true})[h₁] at h₄ -- the second term in h₄ is decidable and True. What remains is ¬(0 < o), or o = 0 - case succ pp hp => - simp_arith - apply root_unfold - -private theorem CompleteTree.heapRemoveLastAuxIsHeap -{α : Type u} -{β : Nat → Type u} -{heap : CompleteTree α (o+1)} -{le : α → α → Bool} -(aux0 : α → (β 1)) -(auxl : {prev_size curr_size : Nat} → β prev_size → (h₁ : prev_size < curr_size) → β curr_size) -(auxr : {prev_size curr_size : Nat} → β prev_size → (left_size : Nat) → (h₁ : prev_size + left_size < curr_size) → β curr_size) -(h₁ : HeapPredicate heap le) (h₂ : transitive_le le) (h₃ : total_le le) : HeapPredicate ((heap.heapRemoveLastAux aux0 auxl auxr).fst) le := by - unfold heapRemoveLastAux - split - rename_i n m v l r _ _ _ - exact - if h₄ : 0 = (n+m) then by - simp only [h₄, reduceDite, castZeroHeap] - else by - simp[h₄] - exact - if h₅ : (m<n ∧ Nat.nextPowerOfTwo (m+1) = m+1) then by - simp only [h₅, and_self, ↓reduceDite] - cases n - case zero => - exact absurd h₅.left $ Nat.not_lt_zero m - case succ ll h₆ h₇ h₈ => - simp only - apply HeapPredicate.seesThroughCast2 <;> try simp_arith - cases ll - case a.zero => -- if ll is zero, then (heapRemoveLast l).snd is a leaf. - have h₆ := heapRemoveLastAuxLeaf l aux0 auxl auxr - rw[h₆] - unfold HeapPredicate at * - have h₇ : HeapPredicate .leaf le := by trivial - have h₈ : HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf le v .leaf := by trivial - exact ⟨h₇,h₁.right.left, h₈, h₁.right.right.right⟩ - case a.succ nn => -- if ll is not zero, then the root element before and after heapRemoveLast is the same. - unfold HeapPredicate at * - simp only [heapRemoveLastAuxIsHeap aux0 auxl auxr h₁.left h₂ h₃, h₁.right.left, h₁.right.right.right, and_true, true_and] - unfold HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf - simp only - rw[←heapRemoveLastAuxLeavesRoot] - exact h₁.right.right.left - else by - simp[h₅] - cases m - case zero => - simp only [Nat.add_zero] at h₄ -- n ≠ 0 - simp (config := { ground := true }) only [Nat.zero_add, and_true, Nat.not_lt, Nat.le_zero_eq, Ne.symm h₄] at h₅ -- the second term in h₅ is decidable and True. What remains is ¬(0 < n), or n = 0 - case succ mm h₆ h₇ h₈ => - unfold HeapPredicate at * - simp only [h₁, heapRemoveLastAuxIsHeap aux0 auxl auxr h₁.right.left h₂ h₃, true_and] - unfold HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf - exact match mm with - | 0 => rfl - | o+1 => - have h₉ : le v ((r.heapRemoveLastAux _ _ _).fst.root (Nat.zero_lt_succ o)) := by - rw[←heapRemoveLastAuxLeavesRoot] - exact h₁.right.right.right - h₉ - -private theorem CompleteTree.heapRemoveLastIsHeap {α : Type u} {heap : CompleteTree α (o+1)} {le : α → α → Bool} (h₁ : HeapPredicate heap le) (h₂ : transitive_le le) (h₃ : total_le le) : HeapPredicate (heap.heapRemoveLast.fst) le := - heapRemoveLastAuxIsHeap _ _ _ h₁ h₂ h₃ - -private theorem CompleteTree.heapRemoveLastWithIndexIsHeap {α : Type u} {heap : CompleteTree α (o+1)} {le : α → α → Bool} (h₁ : HeapPredicate heap le) (h₂ : transitive_le le) (h₃ : total_le le) : HeapPredicate (heap.heapRemoveLastWithIndex.fst) le := - heapRemoveLastAuxIsHeap _ _ _ h₁ h₂ h₃ - -/-- - Helper for CompleteTree.heapUpdateAt. Makes proofing heap predicate work in Lean 4.9 - -/ -def CompleteTree.heapUpdateRoot {α : Type u} {n : Nat} (le : α → α → Bool) (value : α) (heap : CompleteTree α n) (_ : n > 0) : CompleteTree α n × α := -match n, heap with - | (o+p+1), .branch v l r h₃ h₄ h₅ => - if h₆ : o = 0 then - -- have : p = 0 := (Nat.le_zero_eq p).mp $ h₇.subst h₃ --not needed, left here for reference - (.branch value l r h₃ h₄ h₅, v) - else - have h₇ : o > 0 := Nat.zero_lt_of_ne_zero h₆ - let lr := l.root h₇ - if h₈ : p = 0 then - if le value lr then - (.branch value l r h₃ h₄ h₅, v) - else - -- We would not need to recurse further, because we know o = 1. - -- However, that would introduce type casts, what makes proving harder... - -- have h₉: o = 1 := Nat.le_antisymm (by simp_arith[h₈] at h₄; exact h₄) (Nat.succ_le_of_lt h₇) - let ln := heapUpdateRoot le value l h₇ - (.branch ln.snd ln.fst r h₃ h₄ h₅, v) - else - have h₉ : p > 0 := Nat.zero_lt_of_ne_zero h₈ - let rr := r.root h₉ - if le value lr ∧ le value rr then - (.branch value l r h₃ h₄ h₅, v) - else if le lr rr then -- value is gt either left or right root. Move it down accordingly - let ln := heapUpdateRoot le value l h₇ - (.branch ln.snd ln.fst r h₃ h₄ h₅, v) - else - let rn := heapUpdateRoot le value r h₉ - (.branch rn.snd l rn.fst h₃ h₄ h₅, v) -/-- - Helper for CompleteTree.heapRemoveAt. - Removes the element at index, and instead inserts the given value. - Returns the element at index, and the resulting tree. - -/ -def CompleteTree.heapUpdateAt {α : Type u} {n : Nat} (le : α → α → Bool) (index : Fin n) (value : α) (heap : CompleteTree α n) (h₁ : n > 0) : CompleteTree α n × α := - if h₂ : index == ⟨0,h₁⟩ then - heapUpdateRoot le value heap h₁ - else - match n, heap with - | (o+p+1), .branch v l r h₃ h₄ h₅ => - let (v, value) := if le v value then (v, value) else (value, v) - if h₆ : index ≤ o then - have h₇ : Nat.pred index.val < o := Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le (Nat.pred_lt $ Fin.val_ne_of_ne (ne_of_beq_false $ Bool.of_not_eq_true h₂)) h₆ - let index_in_left : Fin o := ⟨index.val.pred, h₇⟩ - have h₈ : 0 < o := Nat.zero_lt_of_lt h₇ - let result := heapUpdateAt le index_in_left value l h₈ - (.branch v result.fst r h₃ h₄ h₅, result.snd) - else - have h₇ : index.val - (o + 1) < p := - -- tactic rewrite failed, result is not type correct. - have h₈ : index.val < p + o + 1 := index.isLt - |> (Nat.add_assoc o p 1).subst - |> (Nat.add_comm p 1).subst (motive := λx ↦ index.val < o + x) - |> (Nat.add_assoc o 1 p).symm.subst - |> (Nat.add_comm (o+1) p).subst - Nat.sub_lt_of_lt_add h₈ $ (Nat.not_le_eq index.val o).mp h₆ - let index_in_right : Fin p := ⟨index.val - o - 1, h₇⟩ - have h₈ : 0 < p := Nat.zero_lt_of_lt h₇ - let result := heapUpdateAt le index_in_right value r h₈ - (.branch v l result.fst h₃ h₄ h₅, result.snd) - -private theorem CompleteTree.heapUpdateRootReturnsRoot {α : Type u} {n : Nat} (le : α → α → Bool) (value : α) (heap : CompleteTree α n) (h₁ : n > 0) : (heap.heapUpdateRoot le value h₁).snd = heap.root h₁ := by - unfold heapUpdateRoot - split - rename_i o p v l r h₃ h₄ h₅ h₁ - simp - cases o <;> simp - case zero => - exact root_unfold v l r h₃ h₄ h₅ h₁ - case succ => - cases p <;> simp - case zero => - cases le value (root l _) - <;> simp only [Bool.false_eq_true, ↓reduceIte, root_unfold] - case succ => - cases le value (root l _) <;> cases le value (root r _) - <;> cases le (root l _) (root r _) - <;> simp only [Bool.false_eq_true, and_self, and_true, and_false, ↓reduceIte, root_unfold] - -private theorem CompleteTree.heapUpdateRootPossibleRootValuesAuxL {α : Type u} (heap : CompleteTree α n) (h₁ : n > 1) : 0 < heap.leftLen (Nat.lt_trans (Nat.lt_succ_self 0) h₁) := - match h₅: n, heap with - | (o+p+1), .branch v l r h₂ h₃ h₄ => by - simp[leftLen, length] - cases o - case zero => rewrite[(Nat.le_zero_eq p).mp h₂] at h₁; contradiction - case succ q => exact Nat.zero_lt_succ q - -private theorem CompleteTree.heapUpdateRootPossibleRootValuesAuxR {α : Type u} (heap : CompleteTree α n) (h₁ : n > 2) : 0 < heap.rightLen (Nat.lt_trans (Nat.lt_succ_self 0) $ Nat.lt_trans (Nat.lt_succ_self 1) h₁) := - match h₅: n, heap with - | (o+p+1), .branch v l r h₂ h₃ h₄ => by - simp[rightLen, length] - cases p - case zero => simp_arith at h₁; simp at h₃; exact absurd h₁ (Nat.not_le_of_gt h₃) - case succ q => exact Nat.zero_lt_succ q - -private theorem CompleteTree.heapUpdateRootPossibleRootValues1 {α : Type u} (le : α → α → Bool) (value : α) (heap : CompleteTree α n) (h₁ : n = 1) : (heap.heapUpdateRoot le value (h₁.substr (Nat.lt_succ_self 0))).fst.root (h₁.substr (Nat.lt_succ_self 0)) = value := by - unfold heapUpdateRoot - generalize (h₁.substr (Nat.lt_succ_self 0) : n > 0) = hx - split - rename_i o p v l r _ _ _ h₁ - have h₃ : o = 0 := (Nat.add_eq_zero.mp $ Nat.succ.inj h₁).left - simp[h₃, root_unfold] - -private theorem CompleteTree.heapUpdateRootPossibleRootValues2 {α : Type u} (le : α → α → Bool) (value : α) (heap : CompleteTree α n) (h₁ : n = 2) : -have h₂ : 0 < n := Nat.lt_trans (Nat.lt_succ_self 0) $ h₁.substr (Nat.lt_succ_self 1) -have h₃ : 0 < leftLen heap h₂ := heapUpdateRootPossibleRootValuesAuxL heap (h₁.substr (Nat.lt_succ_self 1)) -(heap.heapUpdateRoot le value h₂).fst.root h₂ = value -∨ (heap.heapUpdateRoot le value h₂).fst.root h₂ = (heap.left h₂).root h₃ -:= by - simp - unfold heapUpdateRoot - generalize (Nat.lt_trans (Nat.lt_succ_self 0) (Eq.substr h₁ (Nat.lt_succ_self 1)) : 0 < n) = h₂ - split - rename_i o p v l r h₃ h₄ h₅ h₂ - cases o <;> simp - case zero => simp only[root, true_or] - case succ oo => - have h₆ : p = 0 := by simp at h₁; omega - simp only [h₆, ↓reduceDite] - cases le value (l.root _) - <;> simp[heapUpdateRootReturnsRoot, root_unfold, left_unfold] - -private theorem CompleteTree.heapUpdateRootPossibleRootValues3 {α : Type u} (le : α → α → Bool) (value : α) (heap : CompleteTree α n) (h₁ : n > 2) : -have h₂ : 0 < n := Nat.lt_trans (Nat.lt_succ_self 0) $ Nat.lt_trans (Nat.lt_succ_self 1) h₁ -have h₃ : 0 < leftLen heap h₂ := heapUpdateRootPossibleRootValuesAuxL heap $ Nat.lt_trans (Nat.lt_succ_self 1) h₁ -have h₄ : 0 < rightLen heap h₂ := heapUpdateRootPossibleRootValuesAuxR heap h₁ -(heap.heapUpdateRoot le value h₂).fst.root h₂ = value -∨ (heap.heapUpdateRoot le value h₂).fst.root h₂ = (heap.left h₂).root h₃ -∨ (heap.heapUpdateRoot le value h₂).fst.root h₂ = (heap.right h₂).root h₄ -:= by - simp only - unfold heapUpdateRoot - generalize (Nat.lt_trans (Nat.lt_succ_self 0) (Nat.lt_trans (Nat.lt_succ_self 1) h₁) : 0 < n) = h₂ - split - rename_i o p v l r h₃ h₄ h₅ h₂ - cases o - case zero => simp only[root, true_or] - case succ oo => - have h₆ : p ≠ 0 := by simp at h₁; omega - simp only [Nat.add_one_ne_zero, ↓reduceDite, h₆] - cases le value (l.root _) <;> simp - rotate_right - cases le value (r.root _) <;> simp - case true.true => simp[root] - case false | true.false => - cases le (l.root _) (r.root _) - <;> simp only [Bool.false_eq_true, ↓reduceIte, heapUpdateRootReturnsRoot, root_unfold, left_unfold, right_unfold, true_or, or_true] - -private theorem CompleteTree.heapUpdateRootIsHeapLeRootAux {α : Type u} (le : α → α → Bool) (value : α) (heap : CompleteTree α n) (h₁ : HeapPredicate heap le) (h₂ : n > 0) (h₃ : le (root heap h₂) value) : HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf le (root heap h₂) (heapUpdateRoot le value heap h₂).fst := - if h₄ : n = 1 then by - have h₅ : le (heap.root h₂) ( (heapUpdateRoot le value heap h₂).fst.root h₂) := by simp only[h₃, h₄, heapUpdateRootPossibleRootValues1] - unfold HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf - split - · rfl - · exact h₅ - else if h₅ : n = 2 then by - have h₆ := heapUpdateRootPossibleRootValues2 le value heap h₅ - cases h₆ - case inl h₆ => - have h₇ : le (heap.root h₂) ( (heapUpdateRoot le value heap h₂).fst.root h₂) := by simp only [h₆, h₃] - unfold HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf - split - · rfl - · exact h₇ - case inr h₆ => - unfold HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf - unfold HeapPredicate at h₁ - split at h₁ - case h_1 => contradiction - case h_2 o p v l r h₇ h₈ h₉ => - have h₁₁ : p = 0 := by - simp at h₅ - cases o; simp only [Nat.le_zero_eq] at h₇; exact h₇; simp_arith[Nat.add_eq_zero] at h₅; exact h₅.right - have h₁₀ : o = 1 := by simp_arith[h₁₁] at h₅; assumption - simp only - rw[h₆] - have h₁₂ := h₁.right.right.left - unfold HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf at h₁₂ - cases o ; contradiction; - case succ => - exact h₁₂ - else by - have h₆ : n > 2 := by omega - have h₇ := heapUpdateRootPossibleRootValues3 le value heap h₆ - simp at h₇ - unfold HeapPredicate at h₁ - cases h₇ - case inl h₇ => - have h₈ : le (heap.root h₂) ( (heapUpdateRoot le value heap h₂).fst.root h₂) := by simp only [h₇, h₃] - unfold HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf - split - · rfl - · exact h₈ - case inr h₇ => - cases h₇ - case inl h₇ | inr h₇ => - unfold HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf - split at h₁ - contradiction - simp_all - case h_2 o p v l r _ _ _ => - cases o - omega - cases p - omega - have h₈ := h₁.right.right.left - have h₉ := h₁.right.right.right - assumption - -private theorem CompleteTree.heapUpdateRootIsHeapLeRootAuxLe {α : Type u} (le : α → α → Bool) {a b c : α} (h₁ : transitive_le le) (h₂ : total_le le) (h₃ : le b c) : ¬le a c ∨ ¬ le a b → le b a -| .inr h₅ => not_le_imp_le h₂ _ _ h₅ -| .inl h₅ => h₁ b c a ⟨h₃,not_le_imp_le h₂ _ _ h₅⟩ - -theorem CompleteTree.heapUpdateRootIsHeap {α : Type u} {n: Nat} (le : α → α → Bool) (value : α) (heap : CompleteTree α n) (h₁ : n > 0) (h₂ : HeapPredicate heap le) (h₃ : transitive_le le) (h₄ : total_le le) : HeapPredicate (heap.heapUpdateRoot le value h₁).fst le := by - unfold heapUpdateRoot - split - rename_i o p v l r h₇ h₈ h₉ heq - exact - if h₁₀ : o = 0 then by - simp only [Nat.add_eq, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, h₁₀, ↓reduceDite] - unfold HeapPredicate at h₂ ⊢ - simp only [h₂, true_and] - unfold HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf - have : p = 0 := by rw[h₁₀, Nat.le_zero_eq] at h₇; assumption - apply And.intro - case left => match o, l with - | Nat.zero, _ => trivial - case right => match p, r with - | Nat.zero, _ => trivial - else if h₁₁ : p = 0 then by - simp only [↓reduceDite, h₁₀, h₁₁] - cases h₉ : le value (root l (_ : 0 < o)) <;> simp - case true => - unfold HeapPredicate at * - simp only [h₂, true_and] - unfold HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf - apply And.intro - case right => match p, r with - | Nat.zero, _ => trivial - case left => match o, l with - | Nat.succ _, _ => assumption - case false => - rw[heapUpdateRootReturnsRoot] - have h₁₂ : le (l.root (Nat.zero_lt_of_ne_zero h₁₀)) value := by simp[h₉, h₄, not_le_imp_le] - have h₁₃ : o = 1 := Nat.le_antisymm (by simp_arith[h₁₁] at h₈; exact h₈) (Nat.succ_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_lt_of_ne_zero h₁₀)) - unfold HeapPredicate at * - simp only [h₂, true_and] --closes one sub-goal - apply And.intro <;> try apply And.intro - case right.right => match p, r with - | 0, .leaf => simp[HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf] - case right.left => - simp only [HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf] - cases o <;> simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, heapUpdateRootPossibleRootValues1, h₁₃, h₁₂] - case left => - apply heapUpdateRootIsHeap - exact h₂.left - exact h₃ - exact h₄ - else if h₁₂ : le value (root l (Nat.zero_lt_of_ne_zero h₁₀)) ∧ le value (root r (Nat.zero_lt_of_ne_zero h₁₁)) then by - unfold HeapPredicate at * - simp only [↓reduceDite, and_self, ↓reduceIte, true_and, h₁₀, h₁₁, h₁₂, h₂] - unfold HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf - cases o - · contradiction - · cases p - · contradiction - · assumption - else by - simp only [↓reduceDite, ↓reduceIte, h₁₀, h₁₁, h₁₂] - have h₁₃ : ¬le value (root l _) ∨ ¬le value (root r _) := (Decidable.not_and_iff_or_not (le value (root l (Nat.zero_lt_of_ne_zero h₁₀)) = true) (le value (root r (Nat.zero_lt_of_ne_zero h₁₁)) = true)).mp h₁₂ - cases h₁₄ : le (root l (_ : 0 < o)) (root r (_ : 0 < p)) - <;> simp only [Bool.false_eq_true, ↓reduceIte] - <;> unfold HeapPredicate at * - <;> simp only [true_and, h₂] - <;> apply And.intro - <;> try apply And.intro - case false.left | true.left => - apply heapUpdateRootIsHeap - <;> simp only [h₂, h₃, h₄] - case false.right.left => - unfold HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf - have h₁₅ : le (r.root _) (l.root _) = true := not_le_imp_le h₄ (l.root _) (r.root _) $ (Bool.not_eq_true $ le (root l (_ : 0 < o)) (root r (_ : 0 < p))).substr h₁₄ - simp only[heapUpdateRootReturnsRoot] - cases o <;> simp only[h₁₅] - case true.right.right => - unfold HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf - simp only[heapUpdateRootReturnsRoot] - cases p <;> simp only[h₁₄] - case false.right.right => - have h₁₅ : le (r.root _) (l.root _) = true := not_le_imp_le h₄ (l.root _) (r.root _) $ (Bool.not_eq_true $ le (root l (_ : 0 < o)) (root r (_ : 0 < p))).substr h₁₄ - have h₁₆ : le (r.root _) value := heapUpdateRootIsHeapLeRootAuxLe le h₃ h₄ h₁₅ h₁₃ - simp only [heapUpdateRootReturnsRoot, heapUpdateRootIsHeapLeRootAux, h₂, h₁₆] - case true.right.left => - have h₁₆ : le (l.root _) value := heapUpdateRootIsHeapLeRootAuxLe le h₃ h₄ h₁₄ h₁₃.symm - simp only [heapUpdateRootReturnsRoot, heapUpdateRootIsHeapLeRootAux, h₂, h₁₆] - -private theorem CompleteTree.heapUpdateAtIsHeapLeRootAux_RootLeValue {α : Type u} {n : Nat} (le : α → α → Bool) (index : Fin n) (value : α) (heap : CompleteTree α n) (h₁ : HeapPredicate heap le) (h₂ : n > 0) (h₃ : le (root heap h₂) value) (h₄ : total_le le) : HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf le (root heap h₂) (heapUpdateAt le index value heap h₂).fst := by - unfold heapUpdateAt - split - case isTrue => exact heapUpdateRootIsHeapLeRootAux le value heap h₁ h₂ h₃ - case isFalse hi => - split - rename_i o p v l r h₆ h₇ h₈ index h₁ h₅ - cases h₉ : le v value <;> simp (config := { ground := true }) only - case false => rw[root_unfold] at h₃; exact absurd h₃ ((Bool.not_eq_true (le v value)).substr h₉) - case true => - rw[root_unfold] - split - <;> simp![reflexive_le, h₄] - -private theorem CompleteTree.heapUpdateAtIsHeapLeRootAux_ValueLeRoot {α : Type u} {n : Nat} (le : α → α → Bool) (index : Fin n) (value : α) (heap : CompleteTree α n) (h₁ : HeapPredicate heap le) (h₂ : n > 0) (h₃ : le value (root heap h₂)) (h₄ : total_le le) (h₅ : transitive_le le) : HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf le value (heapUpdateAt le index value heap h₂).fst := by - unfold heapUpdateAt - split - <;> rename_i h₉ - case isTrue => - unfold heapUpdateRoot - split - rename_i o p v l r h₆ h₇ h₈ h₂ - cases o <;> cases p <;> simp only [↓reduceDite,HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf, root_unfold, h₄, reflexive_le] - <;> unfold HeapPredicate at h₁ - <;> have h₁₀ : le value $ l.root (by omega) := h₅ value v (l.root _) ⟨h₃, h₁.right.right.left⟩ - simp only [↓reduceIte, Nat.add_zero, h₁₀, root_unfold, h₄, reflexive_le] - have h₁₁ : le value $ r.root (by omega) := h₅ value v (r.root _) ⟨h₃, h₁.right.right.right⟩ - simp only [↓reduceIte, h₁₀, h₁₁, and_self, root_unfold, h₄, reflexive_le] - case isFalse => - split - rename_i o p v l r h₆ h₇ h₈ index h₂ hi - cases le v value - <;> simp (config := { ground := true }) only [root_unfold, Nat.pred_eq_sub_one] at h₃ ⊢ - <;> split - <;> unfold HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf - <;> simp only [root_unfold, h₃, h₄, reflexive_le] - -theorem CompleteTree.heapUpdateAtIsHeap {α : Type u} {n : Nat} (le : α → α → Bool) (index : Fin n) (value : α) (heap : CompleteTree α n) (h₁ : n > 0) (h₂ : HeapPredicate heap le) (h₃ : transitive_le le) (h₄ : total_le le) : HeapPredicate (heap.heapUpdateAt le index value h₁).fst le := by - unfold heapUpdateAt - split - case isTrue h₅ => - exact heapUpdateRootIsHeap le value heap h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ - case isFalse h₅ => - split - rename_i o p v l r h₆ h₇ h₈ index h₁ h₅ - cases h₁₀ : le v value <;> simp (config := {ground := true}) -- this could probably be solved without this split, but readability... - <;> split - <;> rename_i h -- h is the same name as used in the function - <;> unfold HeapPredicate at h₂ ⊢ - <;> simp only [h₂, and_true, true_and] - case false.isFalse => - have h₁₀ := not_le_imp_le h₄ v value (Bool.eq_false_iff.mp h₁₀) - have h₁₄ : p > 0 := by cases p; exact absurd (Nat.lt_succ.mp index.isLt) h; exact Nat.zero_lt_succ _ - apply And.intro <;> try apply And.intro - case left => exact heapUpdateAtIsHeap le ⟨index.val - o - 1, _⟩ v r h₁₄ h₂.right.left h₃ h₄ - case right.left => exact HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf_transitive h₃ h₁₀ h₂.right.right.left - case right.right => - have h₁₁: HeapPredicate (heapUpdateAt le ⟨index.val - o - 1, (by omega)⟩ v r h₁₄).fst le := - (heapUpdateAtIsHeap le ⟨index.val - o - 1, (by omega)⟩ v r _ h₂.right.left h₃ h₄) - cases h₁₂ : le v (r.root h₁₄) - case false => - cases p - exact absurd (Nat.lt_succ.mp index.isLt) h - exact absurd h₂.right.right.right ((Bool.eq_false_iff).mp h₁₂) - case true => - have h₁₃ := heapUpdateAtIsHeapLeRootAux_ValueLeRoot le ⟨index.val - o - 1, (by omega)⟩ v r h₂.right.left (by omega) h₁₂ h₄ h₃ - apply HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf_transitive h₃ _ h₁₃ - exact h₁₀ - case false.isTrue => - have h₁₀ := not_le_imp_le h₄ v value (Bool.eq_false_iff.mp h₁₀) - have h₁₄ : o > 0 := by cases o; simp at h₅ h; exact absurd (Fin.val_inj.mp h : index = 0) h₅; exact Nat.zero_lt_succ _ - apply And.intro <;> try apply And.intro - case left => exact heapUpdateAtIsHeap le ⟨index.val - 1, _⟩ v l h₁₄ h₂.left h₃ h₄ - case right.right => exact HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf_transitive h₃ h₁₀ h₂.right.right.right - case right.left => - have h₁₁: HeapPredicate (heapUpdateAt le ⟨index.val - 1, (_)⟩ v l h₁₄).fst le := - (heapUpdateAtIsHeap le ⟨index.val - 1, (by omega)⟩ v l _ h₂.left h₃ h₄) - cases h₁₂ : le v (l.root h₁₄) - case false => - cases o - contradiction -- h₁₄ is False - exact absurd h₂.right.right.left ((Bool.eq_false_iff).mp h₁₂) - case true => - have h₁₃ := heapUpdateAtIsHeapLeRootAux_ValueLeRoot le ⟨index.val - 1, (by omega)⟩ v l h₂.left (by omega) h₁₂ h₄ h₃ - apply HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf_transitive h₃ _ h₁₃ - exact h₁₀ - case true.isFalse => - have h₁₄ : p > 0 := by cases p; exact absurd (Nat.lt_succ.mp index.isLt) h; exact Nat.zero_lt_succ _ - apply And.intro - case left => exact heapUpdateAtIsHeap le ⟨index.val - o - 1, _⟩ value r h₁₄ h₂.right.left h₃ h₄ - case right => - have h₁₁: HeapPredicate (heapUpdateAt le ⟨index.val - o - 1, (by omega)⟩ v r (h₁₄)).fst le := - (heapUpdateAtIsHeap le ⟨index.val - o - 1, (by omega)⟩ v r _ h₂.right.left h₃ h₄) - cases h₁₂ : le value (r.root h₁₄) - case false => - have h₁₃ := heapUpdateAtIsHeapLeRootAux_RootLeValue le ⟨index.val - o - 1, (by omega)⟩ value r h₂.right.left (by omega) (not_le_imp_le h₄ value (r.root h₁₄) (Bool.eq_false_iff.mp h₁₂)) h₄ - apply HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf_transitive h₃ _ h₁₃ - cases p - contradiction -- h₁₄ is False - exact h₂.right.right.right - case true => - have h₁₃ := heapUpdateAtIsHeapLeRootAux_ValueLeRoot le ⟨index.val - o - 1, (by omega)⟩ value r h₂.right.left (by omega) h₁₂ h₄ h₃ - apply HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf_transitive h₃ _ h₁₃ - exact h₁₀ - case true.isTrue => - have h₁₄ : o > 0 := by cases o; simp at h₅ h; exact absurd (Fin.val_inj.mp h : index = 0) h₅; exact Nat.zero_lt_succ _ - apply And.intro - case left => exact heapUpdateAtIsHeap le ⟨index.val - 1, _⟩ value l h₁₄ h₂.left h₃ h₄ - case right => - have h₁₁: HeapPredicate (heapUpdateAt le ⟨index.val - 1, (by omega)⟩ v l h₁₄).fst le := - (heapUpdateAtIsHeap le ⟨index.val - 1, (by omega)⟩ v l _ h₂.left h₃ h₄) - cases h₁₂ : le value (l.root h₁₄) - case false => - have h₁₃ := heapUpdateAtIsHeapLeRootAux_RootLeValue le ⟨index.val - 1, (by omega)⟩ value l h₂.left (by omega) (not_le_imp_le h₄ value (l.root h₁₄) (Bool.eq_false_iff.mp h₁₂)) h₄ - apply HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf_transitive h₃ _ h₁₃ - cases o - contradiction -- h₁₄ is False - exact h₂.right.right.left - case true => - have h₁₃ := heapUpdateAtIsHeapLeRootAux_ValueLeRoot le ⟨index.val - 1, (by omega)⟩ value l h₂.left (by omega) h₁₂ h₄ h₃ - apply HeapPredicate.leOrLeaf_transitive h₃ _ h₁₃ - exact h₁₀ - -def CompleteTree.heapPop {α : Type u} {n : Nat} (le : α → α → Bool) (heap : CompleteTree α (n+1)) : CompleteTree α n × α := - let l := heap.heapRemoveLast - if p : n > 0 then - heapUpdateRoot le l.snd l.fst p - else - l - -theorem CompleteTree.heapPopIsHeap {α : Type u} {n : Nat} (le : α → α → Bool) (heap : CompleteTree α (n+1)) (h₁ : HeapPredicate heap le) (wellDefinedLe : transitive_le le ∧ total_le le) : HeapPredicate (heap.heapPop le).fst le := by - have h₂ : HeapPredicate heap.heapRemoveLast.fst le := heapRemoveLastIsHeap h₁ wellDefinedLe.left wellDefinedLe.right - unfold heapPop - cases n <;> simp[h₂, heapUpdateRootIsHeap, wellDefinedLe] - -/--Removes the element at a given index. Use `CompleteTree.indexOf` to find the respective index.-/ -def CompleteTree.heapRemoveAt {α : Type u} {n : Nat} (le : α → α → Bool) (index : Fin (n+1)) (heap : CompleteTree α (n+1)) : CompleteTree α n × α := - --Since we cannot even temporarily break the completeness property, we go with the - --version from Wikipedia: We first remove the last element, and then update values in the tree - --indices are depth first, but "last" means last element of the complete tree. - --sooo: - if index_ne_zero : index = 0 then - heapPop le heap - else - let (remaining_tree, removed_element, removed_index) := heap.heapRemoveLastWithIndex - if p : index = removed_index then - (remaining_tree, removed_element) - else - have n_gt_zero : n > 0 := by - cases n - case succ nn => exact Nat.zero_lt_succ nn - case zero => omega - if index_lt_lastIndex : index ≥ removed_index then - let index := index.pred index_ne_zero - heapUpdateAt le index removed_element remaining_tree n_gt_zero - else - let h₁ : index < n := by omega - let index : Fin n := ⟨index, h₁⟩ - heapUpdateAt le index removed_element remaining_tree n_gt_zero - -theorem CompleteTree.heapRemoveAtIsHeap {α : Type u} {n : Nat} (le : α → α → Bool) (index : Fin (n+1)) (heap : CompleteTree α (n+1)) (h₁ : HeapPredicate heap le) (wellDefinedLe : transitive_le le ∧ total_le le) : HeapPredicate (heap.heapRemoveAt le index).fst le := by - have h₂ : HeapPredicate heap.heapRemoveLastWithIndex.fst le := heapRemoveLastWithIndexIsHeap h₁ wellDefinedLe.left wellDefinedLe.right - unfold heapRemoveAt - split - case isTrue => exact heapPopIsHeap le heap h₁ wellDefinedLe - case isFalse h₃ => - cases h: (index = heap.heapRemoveLastWithIndex.snd.snd : Bool) - <;> simp_all - split - <;> apply heapUpdateAtIsHeap <;> simp_all - -end BinaryHeap -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -structure BinaryHeap (α : Type u) (le : α → α → Bool) (n : Nat) where - tree : BinaryHeap.CompleteTree α n - valid : BinaryHeap.HeapPredicate tree le - wellDefinedLe : BinaryHeap.transitive_le le ∧ BinaryHeap.total_le le - -namespace BinaryHeap - -def push {α : Type u} {lt : α → α → Bool} {n : Nat} : α → BinaryHeap α lt n → BinaryHeap α lt (n+1) -| elem, .mk tree valid wellDefinedLe => - let valid := tree.heapPushIsHeap valid wellDefinedLe.left wellDefinedLe.right - let tree := tree.heapPush lt elem - {tree, valid, wellDefinedLe} - -def pop {α : Type u} {le : α → α → Bool} {n : Nat} : (BinaryHeap α le (n+1)) → (BinaryHeap α le n × α) -| {tree, valid, wellDefinedLe} => - let result := tree.heapPop le - let resultValid := CompleteTree.heapPopIsHeap le tree valid wellDefinedLe - ({ tree := result.fst, valid := resultValid, wellDefinedLe}, result.snd) - -def RemoveAt {α : Type u} {le : α → α → Bool} {n : Nat} : (BinaryHeap α le (n+1)) → (Fin (n+1)) → (BinaryHeap α le n × α) -| {tree, valid, wellDefinedLe}, index => - let result := tree.heapRemoveAt le index - let resultValid := CompleteTree.heapRemoveAtIsHeap le index tree valid wellDefinedLe - ({ tree := result.fst, valid := resultValid, wellDefinedLe}, result.snd) - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - -private def TestHeap := - let ins : {n: Nat} → Nat → CompleteTree Nat n → CompleteTree Nat (n+1) := λ x y ↦ CompleteTree.heapPush (.≤.) x y - ins 5 CompleteTree.empty - |> ins 3 - |> ins 7 - |> ins 12 - |> ins 13 - |> ins 2 - |> ins 8 - |> ins 97 - |> ins 2 - |> ins 64 - |> ins 71 - |> ins 21 - |> ins 3 - |> ins 4 - |> ins 199 - |> ins 24 - |> ins 3 - -#eval TestHeap -#eval TestHeap.heapRemoveLastWithIndex -#eval TestHeap.indexOf (4 = ·) - -#eval TestHeap.heapRemoveAt (.≤.) 14 - -private def TestHeap2 := - let ins : {n: Nat} → Nat → CompleteTree Nat n → CompleteTree Nat (n+1) := λ x y ↦ CompleteTree.heapPush (.≤.) x y - ins 5 CompleteTree.empty - |> ins 1 - |> ins 2 - |> ins 3 - - -#eval TestHeap2 -#eval TestHeap2.heapRemoveAt (.≤.) 2 -#eval TestHeap2.heapUpdateAt (.≤.) 3 27 (by omega) diff --git a/Common/Nat.lean b/Common/Nat.lean deleted file mode 100644 index e921f2b..0000000 --- a/Common/Nat.lean +++ /dev/null @@ -1,172 +0,0 @@ - -theorem Nat.power_of_two_go_eq_eq (n : Nat) (p : n >0) : Nat.nextPowerOfTwo.go n n p = n := by - unfold Nat.nextPowerOfTwo.go - simp_arith - -theorem Nat.smaller_smaller_exp {n m o : Nat} (p : o ^ n < o ^ m) (q : o > 0) : n < m := - if h₁ : m ≤ n then - by have h₂ := Nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_right (q) h₁ - have h₃ := Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt h₂ p - simp_arith at h₃ - else - by rewrite[Nat.not_ge_eq] at h₁ - trivial - -private theorem mul2_isPowerOfTwo_smaller_smaller_equal (n : Nat) (power : Nat) (h₁ : n.isPowerOfTwo) (h₂ : power.isPowerOfTwo) (h₃ : power < n) : power * 2 ≤ n := by - unfold Nat.isPowerOfTwo at h₁ h₂ - have ⟨k, h₄⟩ := h₁ - have ⟨l, h₅⟩ := h₂ - rewrite [h₅] - rewrite[←Nat.pow_succ 2 l] - rewrite[h₄] - have h₆ : 2 > 0 := by decide - apply (Nat.pow_le_pow_of_le_right h₆) - rewrite [h₅] at h₃ - rewrite [h₄] at h₃ - have h₃ := Nat.smaller_smaller_exp h₃ - simp_arith at h₃ - assumption - -private theorem power_of_two_go_one_eq (n : Nat) (power : Nat) (h₁ : n.isPowerOfTwo) (h₂ : power.isPowerOfTwo) (h₃ : power ≤ n) : Nat.nextPowerOfTwo.go n power (Nat.pos_of_isPowerOfTwo h₂) = n := by - unfold Nat.nextPowerOfTwo.go - split - case isTrue h₄ => exact power_of_two_go_one_eq n (power*2) (h₁) (Nat.mul2_isPowerOfTwo_of_isPowerOfTwo h₂) (mul2_isPowerOfTwo_smaller_smaller_equal n power h₁ h₂ h₄) - case isFalse h₄ => rewrite[Nat.not_lt_eq power n] at h₄ - exact Nat.le_antisymm h₃ h₄ -termination_by n - power -decreasing_by - simp_wf - have := Nat.pos_of_isPowerOfTwo h₂ - apply Nat.nextPowerOfTwo_dec <;> assumption - -private theorem power_of_two_eq_power_of_two (n : Nat) : n.isPowerOfTwo → (n.nextPowerOfTwo = n) := by - intro h₁ - unfold Nat.nextPowerOfTwo - apply power_of_two_go_one_eq - case h₁ => assumption - case h₂ => exact Nat.one_isPowerOfTwo - case h₃ => exact (Nat.pos_of_isPowerOfTwo h₁) - -private theorem eq_power_of_two_power_of_two (n : Nat) : (n.nextPowerOfTwo = n) → n.isPowerOfTwo := by - have h₂ := Nat.isPowerOfTwo_nextPowerOfTwo n - intro h₁ - revert h₂ - rewrite[h₁] - intro - assumption - -theorem Nat.power_of_two_iff_next_power_eq (n : Nat) : n.isPowerOfTwo ↔ (n.nextPowerOfTwo = n) := - Iff.intro (power_of_two_eq_power_of_two n) (eq_power_of_two_power_of_two n) - -theorem Nat.mul2_ispowerOfTwo_iff_isPowerOfTwo (n : Nat) : n.isPowerOfTwo ↔ (2*n).isPowerOfTwo := - have h₁ : n.isPowerOfTwo → (2*n).isPowerOfTwo := by - simp[Nat.mul_comm] - apply Nat.mul2_isPowerOfTwo_of_isPowerOfTwo - have h₂ : (2*n).isPowerOfTwo → n.isPowerOfTwo := - if h₂ : n.nextPowerOfTwo = n then by - simp[power_of_two_iff_next_power_eq,h₂] - else by - intro h₃ - simp[←power_of_two_iff_next_power_eq] at h₂ - have h₅ := h₃ - unfold Nat.isPowerOfTwo at h₃ - let ⟨k,h₄⟩ := h₃ - cases n with - | zero => contradiction - | succ m => cases k with - | zero => simp_arith at h₄ - | succ l => rewrite[Nat.pow_succ 2 l] at h₄ - rewrite[Nat.mul_comm (2^l) 2] at h₄ - have h₄ := Nat.eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left (by decide : 0<2) h₄ - exists l - Iff.intro h₁ h₂ - - -mutual - -- intentionally not decidable. This is a logical model, not meant for runtime! - def Nat.isEven : Nat → Prop - | .zero => True - | .succ n => Nat.isOdd n - -- intentionally not decidable. This is a logical model, not meant for runtime! - def Nat.isOdd : Nat → Prop - | .zero => False - | .succ n => Nat.isEven n -end - -theorem Nat.mul_2_is_even {n m : Nat} (h₁ : n = 2 * m) : Nat.isEven n := by - cases m with - | zero => simp[Nat.isEven, h₁] - | succ o => simp_arith at h₁ - simp[Nat.isEven, Nat.isOdd, h₁] - exact Nat.mul_2_is_even (rfl) - -theorem Nat.isPowerOfTwo_even_or_one {n : Nat} (h₁ : n.isPowerOfTwo) : (n = 1 ∨ (Nat.isEven n)) := by - simp[Nat.isPowerOfTwo] at h₁ - let ⟨k,h₂⟩ := h₁ - cases k with - | zero => simp_arith[h₂] - | succ l => rewrite[Nat.pow_succ] at h₂ - rewrite[Nat.mul_comm (2^l) 2] at h₂ - exact Or.inr $ Nat.mul_2_is_even h₂ - -mutual - private theorem Nat.not_even_odd {n : Nat} (h₁ : ¬Nat.isEven n) : (Nat.isOdd n) := by - cases n with - | zero => unfold Nat.isEven at h₁; contradiction - | succ o => simp[Nat.isEven, Nat.isOdd] at * - exact (Nat.not_odd_even (by simp[h₁])) - private theorem Nat.not_odd_even {n : Nat} (h₁ : ¬Nat.isOdd n) : (Nat.isEven n) := by - cases n with - | zero => simp[isEven] - | succ o => simp[Nat.isEven, Nat.isOdd] at * - exact (Nat.not_even_odd (by simp[h₁])) -end - -mutual - private theorem Nat.even_not_odd {n : Nat} (h₁ : Nat.isEven n) : ¬(Nat.isOdd n ):= by - cases n with - | zero => unfold Nat.isOdd; trivial - | succ o => simp[Nat.isEven, Nat.isOdd] at * - simp[Nat.odd_not_even h₁] - private theorem Nat.odd_not_even {n : Nat} (h₁ : Nat.isOdd n) : ¬(Nat.isEven n ):= by - cases n with - | zero => unfold isOdd at h₁; contradiction - | succ o => simp[Nat.isEven, Nat.isOdd] at * - simp[Nat.even_not_odd h₁] -end - -theorem Nat.odd_not_even_odd {n : Nat} : Nat.isOdd n ↔ ¬Nat.isEven n := - Iff.intro Nat.odd_not_even Nat.not_even_odd - -theorem Nat.even_not_odd_even {n : Nat} : Nat.isEven n ↔ ¬Nat.isOdd n := - Iff.intro Nat.even_not_odd Nat.not_odd_even - -theorem Nat.pred_even_odd {n : Nat} (h₁ : Nat.isEven n) (h₂ : n > 0) : Nat.isOdd n.pred := by - cases n with - | zero => contradiction - | succ o => simp[Nat.isEven] at h₁ - assumption - -theorem Nat.sub_lt_of_lt_add {a b c : Nat} (h₁ : a < c + b) (h₂ : b ≤ a) : a - b < c := - have h₃ : a + 1 ≤ c + b := Nat.succ_le_of_lt h₁ - have h₄ := Nat.sub_le_of_le_add h₃ - have h₅ : 1 + a - b ≤ c := (Nat.add_comm a 1).subst (motive := λx ↦ x - b ≤ c) h₄ - have h₆ := Nat.add_sub_assoc h₂ 1 - have h₇ : 1 + (a-b) ≤ c := h₆.subst (motive := λx ↦ x ≤ c) h₅ - have h₈ : (a-b) + 1 ≤ c := (Nat.add_comm 1 (a-b)).subst (motive := λx ↦ x ≤ c) h₇ - Nat.lt_of_succ_le h₈ - -theorem Nat.sub_lt_sub_right {a b c : Nat} (h₁ : b ≤ a) (h₂ : a < c) : (a - b < c - b) := by - apply Nat.sub_lt_of_lt_add - case h₂ => assumption - case h₁ => - have h₃ : b ≤ c := Nat.le_of_lt $ Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt h₁ h₂ - rw[Nat.sub_add_cancel h₃] - assumption - -theorem Nat.add_eq_zero {a b : Nat} : a + b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 := by - constructor <;> intro h₁ - case mpr => - simp[h₁] - case mp => - cases a <;> simp_arith at *; assumption |